US
EUROPE
AFRICA
ASIAdocument.write(“” + m[today.getMonth()+1]+ ” “+ today.getDate()+”, ” + theYear + ” “);HOMECHINAWORLDBUSINESSLIFESTYLECULTURETRAVELSPORTSOPINIONREGIONALFORUMNEWSPAPERChina Daily PDFChina Daily E-paperChina Daily Global PDFChina Daily Global E-paperBusiness /ViewEconomyPolicy WatchChina DataCompaniesMarketsIndustriesViewMotoringTechGreen ChinaStability cornerstone of market responseBy James Mccormack(China Daily)Updated:2015-09-29 10:37Comments Print Mail Large Medium SmallChinas patchwork of financial supervision and regulations is consistent with a diffused framework in making decisions
Western criticism of the governments policy response to Chinas market turmoil appears to miss the point. Many expressed views that officials failed to fully understand how the markets operated or failed to develop policies sufficiently sophisticated to cope with the problems.
Let us look at the misconception that Chinese policymakers lacked market insight. Even casual observers of the countrys economy would recognize the increased presence of foreign firms and private innovation, and the diminished role of the State.
State-owned companies retain a dominant role in critical areas of the economy, but private enterprise and market-based solutions have been vital to Chinas rapid industrialization and development.
Still, the governments aversion to financial instability means there are limits when it comes to embracing market-based principles. Although the stock market is small in the broader macroeconomic picture, a period of free fall would sit uncomfortably with the authorities.
In this context, market intervention in the past two months was less about denying that problems existed than maintaining stability. Of course, it would have been better if policies had been rolled out before the equity bubble started to inflate.
Instead, the government actually played an active role in encouraging investment in the market last year. This provided even stronger motivation to intervene during the recent correction.
This brings us to the governments response. The “national team”, or public institutions, involved in providing direct and indirect support to the stock market has been portrayed as disjointed and ineffectual.
It has been argued that with so many institutions involved, including the Ministry of Finance and the Peoples Bank of China, it was difficult to work out which body had the credibility or authority to take a leading role.
In the United States, for example, during a similar market crisis, the Federal Reserve played a pivotal role, while in the eurozone it was the European Central Bank.
But, again, this argument simply misses the point. Chinas patchwork of financial supervision and regulations is consistent with a deliberately diffused policy framework, with State organizations operating collectively under the ultimate guidance of the countrys political leaders.
As such, Chinas authorities are unlikely to conclude from the criticism that they need to appoint an Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Fed, to personify economic authority. It is equally unlikely that there will be a huge overhaul, resulting in a “super-regulator”.
Of course, as the market climbed, debt levels started to rise through margin trading, which involves investing with borrowed money. The policy response to the turmoil that followed also raised debt levels.
In July the China Securities Regulatory Commission relaxed margin lending requirements of brokers, reversing a trend earlier this year. The CSRC was also reported to have extended credit of 260 billion yuan ($40.94 billion) to brokers, with funding from the bond market, banks and the PBOC.
Additionally, the China Banking Regulatory Commission allowed banks to take a more flexible approach to corporate loans collateralized with equities, and encouraged them to lend to listed companies engaged in stock “buy-backs”.
This initiative, while it is likely to increase debt, should not be interpreted as a change in policy direction, as one of the governments overriding objectives remains a reduction of debt in the economy.
The risks of potential solvency problems have been central to the acceptance and adoption of lower economic growth targets. But, as with other immediate policy challenges in China, the authorities see a further build-up in debt as a short-term solution.
The author is global head of sovereigns, Fitch Ratings. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.8.03KPhotoTop 10 most valuable Chinese brandsInfographic: How Chinese and US capital markets differTop 10 countries with the biggest gambling lossesVW helps train young football stars in ChinaiPhone 6s now in Chinese stores for Apple fansInternet titans meet Xi at US-China Internet Industry ForumChina Economy By NumbersChina Economy by Numbers – Dec China Economy by Numbers – Nov NewsmakerTop executive of Infor has head in the cloud Zwilling stays at cutting edge of the kitchenware industryMost ViewedTodays Top NewsNDRC: Wider prospects for foreign investmentMountains of data can be turned into business successUniqlo chief: China slowdown no impact on growth plansBank helps firms with low-cost financingBaosteel starts up Zhanjiang projectAlibaba to Baidu increase US share buybacks as prices slumpApple reports record sales of iPhone 6s, 6s Plus in first weekendBOC expands facilities in Xinjiang for Belt and Road opportunitiesHot TopicsFiat SpA Peugeot SA Taxi app Internet finance Housing price Disneyland 12306.cn WeChatEditors PicksTop 10 countries with the biggest gambling losses Top 9 International Engines of the Year Sino-US business relations: Views from the boardroom Top 10 favorite hotel brands of rich Chinese SpecialsChina-ASEAN Information Harbor ForumSummer Davos 2015Zhanjiang on Maritime Silk Road…| About China Daily | Advertise on Site | Contact Us | Job Offer | Expat Employment |Copyright 1995 -var oTime = new Date();
document.write(oTime.getFullYear());. All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.License for publishing multimedia online 0108263             Registration Number: 130349