USEUROPEAFRICAASIA中文双语FrançaisHOMECHINAWORLDBUSINESSLIFESTYLECULTURETRAVELWATCHTHISSPORTSOPINIONREGIONALFORUMNEWSPAPERChina Daily PDFChina Daily E-paperMOBILEOpinionCartoonsEditorialsOp-EdColumnistsFrom the PressOpinion LineFrom the ReadersBureau ChiefForum TrendsHome / Opinion / Op-Ed ContributorsBuilding a new type of Sino-US relationship
By Shen Dingli | China Daily | Updated:2017-04-05 07:27President Xi Jinping tells visiting US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson that the nations should enhance exchanges at all levels. They met on Sunday at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. [Photo/Xinhua]During his meeting with President Xi Jinping last month, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson conveyed US President Donald Trumps wish to forge China-US relations for the next 50 years. More important, Tillerson said bilateral ties should be based on the principles of “no conflict, no confrontation, mutual respect and win-win cooperation”. The principles are part of the “new type of major-country relationship” Xi proposed to former US president Barack Obama as the future paradigm of China-US ties at their meeting in Sunnylands, California, in 2013.
The Obama administrations response to the proposal was mixed. It did not oppose the idea, even agreed to it at times. But most of the time, the Obama administration avoided using the term. For instance, the immediate response of Obama at the Sunnylands meeting was, “the two countries shall make new cooperation”.
That is why some US policymakers were perplexed by Tillersons use of Chinas idea to define future Beijing-Washington relations. For quite some time, US policymakers have stuck to so-called political correctness by distancing themselves from any Chinese attempt to frame bilateral relations, possibly because China has persistently asked the United States to honor its commitment to the three joint communiqués.
Perhaps the US feels such commitment would restrain it from defining and interpreting Beijing-Washington relations according to its requirements.
The US aversion to the three communiqués indicates it wants to use its “power” to devise a framework for bilateral ties, probably because it “fears” they could undermine its interests. But the fact is, the communiqués have not undermined any legitimate US interests. And since by accepting the three communiqués, whose core is the one-China policy, the US has helped build a solid foundation for bilateral cooperation in business and security matters, both at regional and global levels, there is no reason for it to shy away from them.
To some extent, the “new type of major-country relationship” is similar to the one-China policy. And Washington needs not be averse to it, as it will never lead to any conflict, confrontation, non-respect or zero-sum relations.
If the US cannot accept Chinas framework for bilateral relations, it has to create its own version. In this context, however, Obamas “rebalancing to Asia” strategy was ill-defined and never worked. This means Trump has to devise a new framework, if he doesnt accept Chinas idea, for the crucial China-US relationship.
But that Tillerson “reiterated” Chinas proposal just before Trump meets Xi at Mar-a-Lago Resort in Florida indicates the US State Department has accepted, at least in principle, the Chinese vision of how bilateral relations should move forward.
Hopefully, Tillersons statement is a genuine reflection of the US State Departments view. It seems the US has prepared well for the Xi-Trump meeting in Florida, where the two leaders should reaffirm their common grounds and search for new avenues of cooperation and collaboration on the basis of the “new type of major-country relationship”.
Beijing, on its part, should emphasize the importance of the one-China policy, and reaffirm that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. As Trump has already promised to honor the one-China policy in his phone conversation with Xi, it should not be a challenge for him to reaffirm it.
As for his vision of “Buy American, Hire American”, there will be ample room for the two sides to figure out how they can take their cooperation forward.
China and the US agree that the Korean Peninsula should be free of nuclear weapons. But since the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea continues to push the envelope and the US is proceeding with its goal of deploying the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-missile system in the Republic of Korea, Beijing and Washington have much to talk about to make “the new type of major-country relationship” a mutually fruitful policy.
The author is a professor at and associate dean of the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai.
  Related StoriesPresident Xis state visit to Finland and China-US Presidents meetingChina-US health cooperation expected to growChina-US economic relations: A win-win gameChina-US cooperation holds promise, Li saysChina, US work closely on a possible summitCartoonsWater crisisTHAADNew Maslows hierarchy of needsBrexitRome DeclarationSyrian peace talkMost Viewed in 24 HoursFroum trendsIs top school worth the cost?Should bride prices be abolished?ColumnistsFinland, Switzerland apt models for research, innovationGiant pandas bring Chinese and Americans closer togetherForumFeatured ContributorsAfter Article 50, May can divide and dealGlobalization: Not over, but at crossroadsChina Daily Bureau ChiefsChongqing and Chengdu City Cluster on faster trackXi-Ma meeting brings historic opportunitiesStar BloggersHow a brave girl grabbed happiness with her own handsNot all share bike riders embrace the sharing conceptBACK TO THE TOPHOMECHINAWORLDBUSINESSLIFESTYLECULTURETRAVELWATCHTHISSPORTSOPINIONREGIONALFORUMNEWSPAPERChina Daily PDFChina Daily E-paperMOBILECopyright 1995 -var oTime = new Date();
document.write(oTime.getFullYear());. All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.License for publishing multimedia online 0108263Registration Number: 130349About China DailyAdvertise on SiteContact UsJob OfferExpat EmploymentFOLLOW US